Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther. Reproducibility of the Portuguese version of the PEDro scale. Cad Saude Publica. Evaluation of a programme of workshops for promoting the teaching of critical appraisal skills. Med Educ. Singh J. Critical appraisal skills programme. J Pharmacol Pharmacother. A systematic review of the effectiveness of critical appraisal skills training for clinicians.
Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary? Control Clin Trials. Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. Risk of bias versus quality assessment of randomised controlled trials: cross sectional study.
The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol. A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trial. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions.
J Epidemiol Community Health. Systems to rate the strength of scientific evidence. Evid Rep Technol Assess Summ ; 47 :1— Sibbald WJ. An alternative pathway for preclinical research in fluid management. Crit Care. Comparison of treatment effects between animal experiments and clinical trials: systematic review. Progress in using systematic reviews of animal studies to improve translational research.
PLoS Med. Stroke Therapy Academic Industry R Recommendations for standards regarding preclinical neuroprotective and restorative drug development. Update of the stroke therapy academic industry roundtable preclinical recommendations. Pooling of animal experimental data reveals influence of study design and publication bias. Randomised trials in surgery: problems and possible solutions. Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies.
Health Technol Assess. Methodological index for non-randomized studies minors : development and validation of a new instrument. ANZ J Surg. Development of a quality appraisal tool for case series studies using a modified delphi technique. Aid to the evaluation of therapeutic studies. GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness. Am J Manag Care. An overview of clinical research: the lay of the land. Cohort studies: marching towards outcomes.
Stang A. Critical evaluation of the Newcastle-Ottawa scale for the assessment of the quality of nonrandomized studies in meta-analyses. Eur J Epidemiol. Periodontal disease and risk of benign prostate hyperplasia: a cross-sectional study. Methodological guidance for systematic reviews of observational epidemiological studies reporting prevalence and cumulative incidence data. Int J Evid Based Healthc. Crombie I. Pocket guide to critical appraisal: Oxford.
The CARE guidelines: consensus-based clinical case report guideline development. A preliminary, multicenter, prospective and real world study on the hemostasis, coagulation, and safety of hemocoagulase bothrops atrox in patients undergoing transurethral bipolar plasmakinetic prostatectomy.
Front Pharmacol. Comparative effectiveness research. Development and validation of methods for assessing the quality of diagnostic accuracy studies. The development of QUADAS: a tool for the quality assessment of studies of diagnostic accuracy included in systematic reviews. An introduction to economic evaluation: what's in a name? Can J Psychiatr. Evidence based health economics: from effectiveness to efficiency in systematic review. UK: Oxford University Press; The BMJ economic evaluation working party.
How to use an article on economic analysis of clinical practice. Are the results of the study valid? Evidence-based medicine working group. Value Health. Stud Health Technol Inform. Vardell E, Malloy M.
Joanna briggs institute: an evidence-based practice database. Med Ref Serv Q. Hannes K, Lockwood C. Pragmatism as the philosophical foundation for the Joanna Briggs meta-aggregative approach to qualitative evidence synthesis. J Adv Nurs. Quality in qualitative evaluation: a framework for assessing research evidence.
Reporting and methods in clinical prediction research: a systematic review. Assessing bias in studies of prognostic factors. Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't. Tonelli MR. Integrating evidence into clinical practice: an alternative to evidence-based approaches. J Eval Clin Pract. Woolf SH. Evidence-based medicine and practice guidelines: an overview. Cancer Control. Polit DF. Assessing measurement in health: beyond reliability and validity.
Int J Nurs Stud. Qual Life Res. The consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments COSMIN and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. Acad Med. Gallagher EJ. Systematic reviews: a logical methodological extension of evidence-based medicine. Acad Emerg Med. Meta-analyses of randomized controlled trials. N Engl J Med. Oxman AD. Checklists for review articles. Validation of an index of the quality of review articles. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both.
ROBIS: a new tool to assess risk of bias in systematic reviews was developed. Translating guidelines into practice. A systematic review of theoretic concepts, practical experience and research evidence in the adoption of clinical practice guidelines.
Practical guide to understanding the need for clinical practice guidelines. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. The practice guidelines development cycle: a conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation.
J Clin Oncol. Tracy SL. From bench-top to chair-side: how scientific evidence is incorporated into clinical practice. Dent Mater. Using preappraised evidence sources to guide practice decisions. J Am Assoc Nurse Pract. Commentary on the role of expert opinion in developing evidence-based guidelines.
Quality assessment of clinical guidelines in China: — University of. Dundee www. Abbreviated prescribing information is The Pocket Guide to Critical Appraisal. Milne R, Chambers L. Assessing the scientific quality of review articles. Jul 22, Cut-points are generally chosen so as to maintain a balance between sensitivity and specificity. London: BMJ Books.
Edinburgh: Mosby or. NHS Trust. November Lodon: BMJ. Publishing Group, , This became evidence-based practice, as the principles and process were adopted by many disciplines in health and social care. This suggests EBP is a modern concept, but this could be The work of Iain Chalmers and like-minded Crombie I K Pocket guide to critical appraisal. British Medical Crombie, Iain. Objectives: Pain is a common complication in head and neck cancer.
The aim of this paper is to evaluate the evidence from randomised control trials investigating pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods of pain management in head and neck cancer. Material and Methods: Medline, Embase and the Cochrane Physiologic response to crystalloid resuscitation in severe burns.
Ann N Y Acad Sci. Early resuscitation of patients with burns. In: Welch CE, editor. May 24, Rationale and standards in the systematic review of qualitative literature in health services research.
Qual Health Res ; 8: —. A general group discussion of the correct answers completes the session. More demanding in terms of preparation, but likely to be useful for train Documents: Advanced Search Include Citations. Authors: Advanced Search Include Citations. Add To MetaCart. The use of critical appraisal guidelines to assess the validity of research findings has become an established technique in those disciplines, such as healthcare and medicine, that encourage the use of evidence-based practice.
Critical appraisal guidelines provide a rigorous set of criteria, often i Abstract - Cited by 13 2 self - Add to MetaCart The use of critical appraisal guidelines to assess the validity of research findings has become an established technique in those disciplines, such as healthcare and medicine, that encourage the use of evidence-based practice. Critical appraisal guidelines provide a rigorous set of criteria, often in the form of a checklist, against which a piece of research can be assessed.
Although well established criteria exist for many forms of quantitative research, such as clinical trials and cohort studies, qualitative research is less well served. Through a synthesis of existing best practices in interpretative research this paper provides comprehensive guidelines for the conduct of single case study research and extrapolates from them a set of critical appraisal guidelines to assist in the evaluation of such work.
Citation Context Abstract: Both the information base, on which IS research and practice is founded, and its accessibility continue to grow rapidly. A major challenge facing the IS community in the next decade will be discovering how to extract knowledge, useful to, and usable by, all in the community, from this frag Abstract - Cited by 3 1 self - Add to MetaCart Abstract: Both the information base, on which IS research and practice is founded, and its accessibility continue to grow rapidly.
A major challenge facing the IS community in the next decade will be discovering how to extract knowledge, useful to, and usable by, all in the community, from this fragmented, dis-parate, often conflicting and sometimes unevaluated resource.
A formal methodology for the critical appraisal and sys-tematic review of primary research has been developed and, through the Cochrane Collaboration, has become an important. This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree.
Signed……………………………………………………… candidate Abstract - Add to MetaCart This work has not previously been accepted in substance for any degree and is not being concurrently submitted in candidature for any degree.
0コメント